How do I format my annotated bibliography?

An annotated bibliography entry consists of two components: the Citation and the Annotation.

Citation

The citation should be formatted in the bibliographic style that your professor has requested for the assignment. Some common citation styles include APA, MLA, and Chicago. For more information, see the Style Guides page .

Annotation

Generally, an annotation is approximately 100 – 300 words in length ( one paragraph ). However, your professor may have different expectations so it is recommended that you clarify the assignment guidelines .An annotation may include the following information :A brief summary of the sourceThe source’s strengths and weaknessesIts conclusionsWhy the source is relevant in your field of studyIts relationships to other studies in the fieldAn evaluation of the research methodology (if applicable)Information about the author’s backgroundYour personal conclusions about the sourceMLA style format (8th ed.)A brief summary of the sourceThe source’s strengths and weaknessesIts conclusionsWhy the source is relevant in your field of studyIts relationships to other studies in the fieldAn evaluation of the research methodology ( if applicable ) Information about the author’s backgroundYour personal conclusions about the sourceMLA style format ( 8 th ed. )Hanging Indents are required for citations in the bibliography, as shown below. That is, the first line of the citation starts at the left margin, and subsequent lines are indented 4 spaces. The bibliography is double-spaced, both within the citation and between them. The annotation appends the entry unless complete sentences are used, then a line space is added and the annotation begins with a paragraph indent, as shown in the example below .Lozier, Jeffrey D., et al. ” Predicting the Distribution of Sasquatch in Western North America : Anything Goes with Ecological Niche Modelling. ” Journal of Biogeography, vol. 36, no. 9, 2009, pp. 1623 – 1627. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/40305930. Accessed 14 June năm nay. This paper critiques the use of Ecological Niche Models ( ENM ) and species distribution by performing a tongue-in-cheek examination of the distribution of the fictional Sasquatch, based on reports from an trực tuyến Bigfoot archive. Lozier ” s paper powerfully demonstrates the issues faced by ENM, when reports come from non-specialists, and highlights key problems with sourcing data from unmediated trực tuyến environments. The author neglects to compare the reliability of the many wildlife databases with the single Bigfoot database, as well as other key issues ; however in closing, the paper briefly mentions that many issues lie outside the scope of the short article. Lozier ” s paper advises professionals in fields using ENM to carefully assess the source of the data on which the Model is based and concludes that the distribution of rare species in particular is often over-reported to misidentification .Xem thêm : Mệnh Sơn Hạ Hỏa Là Gì Với Vận Mệnh Người Thuộc Mệnh Này ? Sơn Hạ Hỏa Khắc GìAPA style format (7th ed.)APA style format ( 7 th ed. )

Refer to Section 9.51, p. 307 and Figure 9.3, p. 308 in the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association, 7th ed. for detailed information on annotated bibliographies.

The following are general guidelines. Check with your instructor for

References follow the same alphabetical order as entries in a reference list

. The annotation is a new paragraph below its reference entry and follows block quotation format. Should the annotation have multiple paragraphs, the first line of the second and subsequent paragraphs are indented an additional 0.5 in .

D’Elia, G., Jorgensen, C., Woelfel, J., và Rodger, E. J. ( 2002 ). The impact of the Internet on public inthiepcuoi.vnrary use : An analysis of the current consumer market for inthiepcuoi.vnrary and Internet services. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 53 ( 10 ), 808 – 820. doi : 10.1002 / asi. 10102I n this study, the researchers examined if the Internet had affected public inthiepcuoi.vnrary usage in the United States. This study is distinct because its researchers surveyed inthiepcuoi.vnrary nonusers as well as users. The major finding was that 75.2 % of people who used the Internet also used the public inthiepcuoi.vnrary. However, the researchers surveyed only 3000 individuals in a population of millions ; therefore, these results may not be statistically significant. However, this study is relevant because it provides future researchers with a methodology for determining the impact of the Internet on public inthiepcuoi.vnrary usage .Additional resourcesAdditional resourcesWriting an annotated bibliographyFrom Concordia UniversityHow to prepare an annotated bibliographyFrom Cornell UniversityWriting an annotated bibliographyFrom University of Toronto

Annotated bibliographiesFrom Purdue OWL

inthiepcuoi.vnrary

© Simon Fraser University

Connect

inthiepcuoi.vnrary employees

inthiepcuoi.vn

© Simon Fraser UniversitySimon Fraser University inthiepcuoi.vnrary is grateful to be located on the lands of the xʷməθkʷəy ̓ əm ( Musqueam ), Sḵwx ̱ wú7mesh ( Squamish ), səl ̓ ilw ̓ ətaʔɬ ( Tsleil-Waututh ), q ̓ íc ̓ əy ̓ ( Katzie ), kʷikʷəƛ ̓ əm ( Kwikwetlem ), qiqéyt ( Qayqayt ), qʼʷa : n ̓ ƛʼən ̓ ( Kwantlen ), Səmyámə ( Semiahmoo ), sc ̓ əwaθən ( Tsawwassen ), and Stó : lō Nations. Acknowledging the benefits of occupying this land, the inthiepcuoi.vnrary commits to becoming a more welcoming space for Indigenous Peoples by centring Indigenous voices in our collections, services, and programs .

Source: http://139.180.218.5
Category: Thuật ngữ đời thường